Just like the X2 3600+ but with 512KB L2-cache per core rather than 256KB per core.

The first versions of the X2 3800+ (with Manchester core) were aggressively competed by Intel with the Pentium D 830. Both CPU's were priced in the same ballpark and evenl... > Read more

Introduced in May 2006 together with the models from 3800+ up to 5000+. The release was one month before the release of Intel's Core 2 Duo. This hurt sales since people waited for the Core 2 Duo to arrive and once it did it was clear that the Core 2 Duo was the better choice.

This particular 4600... > Read more

Just like the 6000+ but clocked 200MHz slower.... > Read more

AMD launched the 6000+ in February 2007. At that time it was the fastest that AMD had to offer against the Core 2 Duo. Intel still had the fastest product but the 6000+ did offer a fair bit of competition. But, in the end I guess that the 6000+ didn't sell very well due to the hype of the Core 2 Duo... > Read more

I have a bunch of 'Brisbane'-based CPU's including this 4200+ model. It's a stable running CPU that found it's way in lower priced dual-core systems back in 2007 and 2008.... > Read more

The slowest AMD Athlon 64 X2 in the 'Windsor' family. Basically identical to the X2 3800+ but with half the L2-cache enabled.... > Read more

Just like the 4200+ but slightly slower and also a CPU that probably found it's way into a budget system.... > Read more

Production date is week 8, 2008 so that makes this CPU a budget CPU. Consider that in 2008 it was not uncommon to buy a, let's say, Core 2 Duo E8400 which was released early 2008. The 5000+ was budget in 2008, not bad in 2007 and would've been high-end in 2006. The Athlon64 X2 was aging and falling ... > Read more

This CPU is based on the 65nm 'Brisbane' core. The Brisbane (G1-stepping) saw it's light of day in December 2006 in the form of the Athlon 64 X2 4000+, 4400+, 4600+ and 5000+. In that time-frame Intel had it's Core 2 Duo out for a few months. Benchmarks show that the 4400+ falls between the Core 2 D... > Read more

Just like this CPU but clocked 400MHz faster. I haven't benchmarked this one yet but it will probably be equal, if not slightly faster than the Core 2 Duo E6400.... > Read more

... > Read more

... > Read more

... > Read more